Closmore

Field Insight · HP Lessons 6 + 7

Have You Ever Had to "Burn" a Stakeholder to Win a Deal?

I asked 40+ salespeople. Here's what actually wins deals.

Competitor relationship-led vs me — winning through the chaos of being called lazy
Two paths to the same trophy. One relationship-led. One survival-led.

Lesson #6 — The Setup

I once almost lost a deal because:

  • My competitor had a personal relationship with a key committee member
  • A key stakeholder was biased against me — and vocal about it

I had two choices:

  • Walk away
  • Or disrupt the room

→ That's where the "Crying Kid" Strategy came from. Read the full story here.


The Question I Asked Reddit

Is it ever OK to upset a stakeholder to win a deal?

Seesaw: Client Upset = You WIN vs Client Happy = You Lose
The uncomfortable seesaw every enterprise sales rep knows.

The answers split the room. Here's what 40+ salespeople actually said.


Insight #1 — Shift the Criteria, Not the Person

Best comment:

"You don't win by offending people. You win by making the decision harder to justify the wrong way."

The real move isn't attacking people. It's shifting the decision criteria.

Most reps fight:

  • People
  • Opinions
  • Relationships

Top reps shift:

  • What success means
  • How decisions are measured

→ From preference → to accountability


Insight #2 — It's Role Behaviour, Not Personality

Most upvoted comment:

"Yes and it's always procurement." — 43 upvotes

Stakeholders don't just block deals. They optimize for:

  • Budget
  • Risk
  • Internal incentives

This is not personality. This is role-driven behaviour.


Insight #3 — Build the Tension

The boldest comment:

"Sign this, or delete my number."

Sometimes, winning means:

  • Setting boundaries
  • Walking away
  • Not pleasing everyone

Insight #4 — The Mature Take

"Offensive is a bit strong. The job is to tell people what they need to hear."

The difference is intent:

  • Ego → offend ✗
  • Confront → clarify ✓

Lesson #7 — Why Stakeholder Mapping Matters

This is why the 6 Roles, 2 Intents framework exists.

You're not dealing with "people." You're dealing with roles and intent.

6 Roles 2 Intents framework - Vertical roles: Decider, Initiator, User, Influencer, Buyer, Gatekeeper. Horizontal intents: Coach (compass) and Antagonist (knife)
The compass navigates. The knife cuts. Any role can carry either intent.

The real problem isn't conflict.

It's defining what "success" means to the person holding the knife.

Read the full 6 Roles, 2 Intents framework →


Final Insight

I won, not because I offended someone.

I won because I:

  • Identified the Antagonist
  • Activated my Coach
  • Shifted the decision upward

If you fight people, you lose control.

If you control the frame, you control the deal.


This is part of my Sales OS:

#B2BSales#StakeholderStrategy#SalesOS#EnterpriseSales#DealRecovery#SalesLeadership#NegotiationStrategy#AccountManagement#FieldInsight#CryingKidStrategy